Comparison: O.J. Simpson and Tom Robinson Trials Essay

All persons born or change in the linked terra firmas, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce some(prenominal) lawfulness which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States nor shall some(prenominal) State deprive both person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. This was taken right off from the Bill of Rights (Amendment XIV section I), and it clearly states that nonhing should make or enforce any law that dispossesses the immunity of the citizen on trial. In the trials of gobbler Robinson and Orenthal James Simpson, this amendment seemingly may not have been considered. Every bit should be toughened equally, regardless of his race and social status, and in these dickens trials that statement was not being applied.The social and politic al climate of the townsfolk in both cases was a major factor in the leave al wholeness of Robinson and Simpsons trials. In To Kill A Mockingbird, Tom Robinson was a composition of innocence that was accused of rape, a discourtesy he did not commit. tolerate in the 1930s, white men were constantly trying to prove the lifelike inferiority of the African American race, condemning them as unreasonable. The panel was in set upive to look past race and praise the integrity of Tom and stand for the opposite of prejudice. If Tom Robinson were a white man, the outcome of the trial would be entirely different.However, in 1994, times have shown to have changed from the extent of racism and prejudice from the early 1900s. Now, money and popularity is power, despite the race of a person. OJ Simpson was an African American, who was pastureed fairly high on the social scale. He was a well-known, NFL-all star with a great deal of money on his side. The dialog box were in favor of OJ Simp sons innocence from the beginning because they felt that a man like himself could not a crime as native as the murder of two people. Thus, in both cases, the race and rank of the defendant detained a major position in the result of their trials.In both trials, the evidence appeared to be somewhat disregarded by the instrument panel. In Toms trial, there was no medical verification that he took advantage andraped Mayella Ewell. The board could only base their guilty meter of Tom on what was said by the Ewells in the courtroom. Back then, a white persons word was automatically the truth when it was held up to the credibility of someone whom was black. At Simpsons trial, the substantiation of murder was sight wrongfully. At the crime scene of Nicole Simpson and Ron Goldman, blood was found in OJ s car, his socks, and a pair of his rubber gloves, upon many other things. For some reason, the jury looked past this evidence of guilt, and that is wrong.Although there are many similarit ies present amidst the two trials, there are in any case some unlikenesss. One difference is that there was a change of venue made in one case but not the other. It was deliberated in Toms trial but in the end it was determined that a change of venue would not be necessary due to the fact that any jury would find a black man guilty in any case. OJ s case was moved to the downtown district instead of where the crime occurred to avoid racial imbalances and to accommodate the media crash in Los Angeles (trial was moved to Santa Monica). This also made it possible to change the jury, which also had a major effect on the result of OJ s trial.The final verdicts of the two trials are not truthful. Both Tom and OJ were not treated equally as citizens of the United States. Instead, they were thought of as an evil and unreasonable black man and a NFL all star who would never commit a crime. Perhaps if the jury had realized that they were treating these two people unequally and unfairly th e verdicts of these trials would be short different. These trials demonstrate how race, social status, and money have an effect on the new law system. All people are created equally, so they shall be treated equally in any matter